Volume, without the slop.
AI does the first draft and the boring half. A person edits, signs their name to it, and takes the blame if it's wrong.
Replies in under a minute · no booking, no forms
Three reasons this lands on our desk.
Clients want more for less
Twice the output at the same fee, every renewal.
Generated copy reads like generated copy
And your client can tell, even when they can't say why.
Nobody wants to own the mistake
The tool doesn't take responsibility. Someone has to.
Four things, done properly.
A first draft in minutes
Research, structure and draft handled by machine, which is what machines are good at.
An editor who signs it
A named person reads every piece before it leaves. That's the whole quality control.
Your voice, kept
Trained on your existing work so output sounds like your agency, not like everyone's.
Coverage at volume
Dozens of pages a month across clients, tracked so nothing gets published twice.
Every service, every area you serve.
This is the map we work from: one page for each service in each area. Some are live, some are being written, and some we hold back — a thin page helps nobody.
The full ai content engine page ↗sample data — the real thing lives in your portal
Simple to start. Simpler to stay.
Flat monthly, priced per published page — drafting, editing, checking and publishing included. A fraction of writer rates at many times the pace, with a person signing off every piece.
What moves the price
- Pages per month
- How much research each needs
- Size of your coverage map
Before you ask — asked and answered.
Google penalises unhelpful content, whoever wrote it. Edited, accurate, genuinely useful pages are fine — that's why the editor step is not optional.
More output. Same standard.
No forms, no calls — a straight answer in chat.